Some battle royale enthusiasts are experiencing let down, and this isn't because of the latest in-game events. Fortnite's current limited-time event, that brings a Springfield world, has also unveiled a fresh mechanic called pets. It's impossible to ignore that these latest pets are cute. However, the attached costs have left numerous players shocked at this company's attempts to monetize almost each aspect of the game.
Companions are basically similar to digital creatures, but having a few limitations. You can give them a name, and these pets will follow your character throughout a match. These sidekicks are indestructible, and you can interact with them. Opposing players outside your party are unable to see these pets — and showing off your companions is perhaps half the fun of owning them. Sidekicks are able to be customized with outfits and emotes, but the debate revolves around their appearance. A sidekick's main design can only be altered once, after which that selection is final. You can choose a sidekick's coat color, accent hues, iris tones, markings, and its body type.
Should you later choose that you want your pet to appear a bit altered, you cannot just further customize the look. You have to purchase another sidekick. And, these pets are not inexpensive. The majority of players are getting the Peels sidekick, since it is packaged in the current battle pass. Based on leaks, upcoming pets may cost anywhere between 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; for reference, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks are $22.99. You can rename a companion whenever you'd like.
Most pets have not been formally released so far, meaning the cost could well change. But regardless of whether the developer makes companions cheaper, a lot of the anger stems from the reality that players could have to pay for a one kind of pet more than once. For some, the cost structure seems particularly unfair considering the game has previously added companions that ride about as part of backpack accessories. Backpack pets do not have a restriction on changes and can be seen by other participants in the match. Backpack pets cannot be given a name or perform emotes, but other players are able to occasionally engage with them — which is better than remaining invisible completely.
Lack of unique functions and restricted engagement options have numerous gamers feeling underwhelmed. Why can't you, such as, interact playfully with your fancy banana dog? A few point out that companions sometimes fail to keep up with the user if a game is fast-paced, or mention that Peels takes up two slots in the battle pass — which supports the notion that the company is squeezing the community for money. Greedy is a term that's coming up frequently in these discussions, with a number of comparing pet monetization to similar intense pricing schemes in games like EA Sports FC. Additionally, it adds to the issue that certain pets are expected to be pricier than equivalent outfit counterparts.
"PLEASE avoid buy Sidekicks," pleads one popular community thread that advises other players to figuratively express disapproval by not spending.
"I know they're adorable," the post adds, "I know they are fun. I know we have all been looking forward to them. However the greed being shown is unacceptable and should not be rewarded."
In recent years, the game's special occasions and partnerships have grown in scope and ambition, yet the no-cost-to-start game continues to must earn income. As such, the sheer quantity of cosmetics users are able to currently purchase has grown nearly excessive. In addition to standard items like back blings, gliders, pickaxes, and emotes, you could potentially use cash on footwear, music tracks, musical tools, building blocks, vehicles, wheels, custom paint jobs, seasonal rewards, and a membership. Companion pets do not just cost money, and also introduce a range of fresh monetization avenues for the developer. Presumably, players will before long be able to spend for items like sidekick looks, costumes, emotes, and further engagement features.
All of these customization items are completely optional and unneeded to enjoy the experience, but gear can still influence your community interactions. Younger players, for example, sometimes encounter bullying for not wearing flashy sufficiently cool skins. A similar situation also occurred when the developer introduced brand-name shoes, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The footwear pricing scheme wasn't well received as well, and a few fans promised that they wouldn't succumb to the pressure at the time. However in the end, buying shoes became normalized. Today, companion pets are further pushing the limits of what a gamer might be willing to spend to be distinctive within the player base.
Pets are currently a relatively new feature, and they exist a game that updates regularly. A few fans are reporting that they've received a questionnaire that gauges how people think about pet mechanics and monetization, and this might potentially indicate that the developer's strategy are still fluid. Yet if the game footwear are a sign, sidekicks probably won't get more affordable in general — instead, there may be a wider range of costs to shop.
After all, while certain players are expressing anger at Fortnite shop prices, others are experiencing nothing but joy for their new battle royale pals.
A passionate writer and traveler sharing insights on personal growth and lifestyle from a UK perspective.
